2 Jun 2024 2:44 pm
How have you determined that 'Grifty **** Stormy' is the fact, when Stormy has equally insisted the exact opposite is true?Blackvegetable » 01 Jun 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Grifty **** Stormy
Grifty paid her off not to talk about it because it would be very damaging to his election prospects, following on the heels of the ****** Grabbing moment.
Grifty thought it would be clever to figure out a way to write off the payment to spare himself the taxes.
Grifty's solution is determined to be criminal, and Michael Cohen goes to jail for it. It is so open&shut that Cohen pleads.
The unambiguous evidence of the scheme is a group of 34 documents.
Even MAGAt monkeys concede that the records were falsified....in the furtherance of "the cause"
But MAGAt monkeys want to find a technicality to get Grifty off the hook for what they know he's done.
And MAGAt monkeys have become civil liberties woke on behalf of a guy who promises to curtail them.
MAGAt monkeys are some serious morons.
How have you determined that Grifty could only have paid her off for election reasons?
Cohen never understood how he could go to jail over an NDA - his actions do not by necessity, directly involve Trump anyway
34 documents?. No it's 34 counts of 'legal expenses'. It's all the same thing
>Drivel ignored
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.